How should we understand the apostle's words that we are appointed by God for good works in Christ Jesus, and appointed, according to the meaning of the original text, from the beginning of time? Does this mean that we cannot do any works except good ones? Or can the original calling still be violated? And what, then, should we make of the freedom to choose one's spiritual path, about which so many biblical books speak?
One could, of course, say that God really did appoint the human being to good works at the very moment of creation, and if we suppose that God's intention for humanity appears at the same time as his intention for all creation, we could speak even of the beginning of time. But this intention, as can be seen, also included human freedom, freedom so complete that even the fall became possible for the human being, a direct violation of the prohibition God had imposed. As can be seen, calling is calling, and freedom is freedom.
But the apostle is not speaking simply about a calling, but about a calling "in Christ Jesus." This approach changes the matter somewhat: now the question is not simply about the human being, or even simply about the people of God, but about the Messiah and about that messianic remnant of which the prophets spoke. Traditional ideas about the Messiah included precisely the teaching that the Messiah and the people of God had been conceived by God before the creation of the world, at the beginning of time. If so, then everyone who has become a Christian has become part of this plan and of everything connected with it.
Of course, there can be no talk here of predestination with regard to a particular person, for people are not born Christian. Whether to follow Christ or not, each person decides for himself and, naturally, with complete freedom. But when the choice has been made and a person becomes a Christian, he becomes a co-worker in carrying out a plan that truly was conceived by God at the beginning of time. And he receives a new calling to good works in Christ Jesus.
